AOTA Web Site Notice

We will be performing our annual physical AOTA Store inventory beginning Tuesday, June 28th.  During this process, we will be able to accept orders but will be unable to ship physical products right away. We anticipate shipping to resume on or before Friday, July 8th. Please note that orders for online products and ebooks are not affected and will continue to be fulfilled as usual. Thank you for your patience.

AJOT CE: Disability Orientation of Occupational Therapy Practitioners in Physical Rehabilitation Settings: Tension Between Medical and Social Models in Theory and Practice
Sorry! Image not available at this time

SKU: CEAJOT78

Publisher: AOTA Continuing Education

Published: 2021

Ce Ajot Articles
$20.99
Basic Member Price
Non-Member Price: $24.99

Product Overview

Authors:

Roni Holler, Idit Chemla, Adina Maeir

 

CE Credit .1 AOTA CEU (1 contact hour/1.25 NBCOT PDUs)

 

Importance: To date, little is known about the extent to which occupational therapy practitioners have adopted the core insights of disability studies.

 

Objective: To examine the degree to which occupational therapy practitioners endorse the medical model of disability versus the social model of disability in theory and in practice.

 

Design: Cross-sectional study.

 

Setting: Physical rehabilitation facilities, ranging from hospital to community settings.

 

Participants: One hundred two Israeli occupational therapy practitioners.

Outcomes and Measures: The Orientation toward Disability Scale, constructed for this study, has two dimensions that distinguish between the medical and social models of disability: locus of intervention (the person or environment) and client involvement (extent to which the practitioner fosters the client’s autonomy in the rehabilitation process). Each dimension addresses both theoretical

and practical endorsements.

 

Results: Greater support for the social model of disability was mostly evident in the client involvement dimension, whereas support for the medical model of disability was mostly evident in the locus of intervention dimension. Over both dimensions, the medical model of disability was significantly more endorsed in practice than in theory. Work setting and prior exposure to the social model

of disability were found to affect practitioners’ disability orientation.

 

Conclusions and Relevance: Occupational therapy practitioners working in physical rehabilitation are still relatively far from fully adopting the critical insights of the social model of disability. This finding is especially relevant when their actual practice, rather than their theoretical views, is considered and when rehabilitation takes place in out-of-home settings.

What This Article Adds: This study offers unique insight into the disability orientation of occupational therapy practitioners, showing a need for more training programs to expose students to the social model of disability. These programs should use critical discussions of the challenges that this model presents to the profession and barriers to implementing it in practice.

 

Citation: Holler, R., Chemla, I., & Maeir, A. (2021). Disability orientation of occupational therapy practitioners in physical rehabilitation settings: Tension

between medical and social models in theory and practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75, 7504180010. https://doi.org/10.5014/

ajot.2021.042986